China Media Landscape 2026-10-12 8 min read

Chinese Tech Media Outlets: Who Covers Foreign Companies, and How

Chinese tech media outlets are not one market but four: startup press, hardware aggregators, financial desks and English-language arms. Each has a different reason to publish, so one translated release sent to all of them produces reach without coverage.

Chinese Tech Media Outlets: Who Covers What

Key takeaways

  • Chinese tech media outlets divide into four businesses — startup and venture press, consumer and hardware aggregators, financial desks with technology coverage, and English-language outbound arms — and one translated release cannot serve all four.
  • 36Kr, the reference title in the startup tier, reported about 108,000 pieces of content in 2018 and roughly 348 million average monthly page views in the year to mid-2019, but most of that traffic came through Weibo, WeChat, Toutiao and Zhihu accounts rather than its own site.
  • Foreign companies realistically earn substantive coverage from the English-language tier and specialist trade titles first; mainland business desks respond only to a number that changes something or a structural question.
  • Chinese editors weigh news value, verifiability, a China-specific dimension and timing in that order, and a release that fails the first screen is not read further.
  • Translated releases fail less on language than on ratio: English drafts devote most words to the company, while Chinese desks want two or three company sentences and the rest market context.

Chinese tech media outlets are easy to list and hard to read. Most foreign teams start with a set of logos — 36Kr, TMTPost, Caixin, cnBeta — and send one English release to all of them at once. What comes back is a handful of near-identical news flashes on aggregator pages, and silence from the desks that might have written something substantial. The problem is rarely translation quality. It is that "Chinese tech media outlets" describes at least four different businesses, each with its own reason to publish and its own definition of news.

This note separates those four groups, says which of them actually cover foreign companies, and walks through what a Chinese technology editor is weighing when your release reaches their queue.

Chinese tech media outlets split into four different businesses

Treating the category as one list is the most common mistake in China outreach. The four groups below have different audiences, different economics and very different tolerance for translated material.

  • Startup and venture press. 36Kr (36氪), TMTPost (钛媒体), Lieyunwang (猎云网), iHeima (i黑马) and EqualOcean (亿欧) sell access to founders, investors and corporate strategy teams. Funding rounds, market-entry decisions, partnerships and category data are their raw material, and they are the most likely to commission an analysis piece rather than publish a flash.
  • Consumer and hardware aggregators. cnBeta, ITHome (IT之家), MyDrivers (快科技), ZOL (中关村在线) and PConline (太平洋电脑网) run at very high volume with light editing. Specifications, launch dates and prices move through them almost verbatim. Coverage here is a distribution outcome rather than an editorial one, and it should never be reported internally as media validation.
  • Business and financial press with technology desks. Caixin (财新) and Caixin Global, Yicai (第一财经) and Yicai Global, Jiemian (界面新闻), 21st Century Business Herald and Economic Observer publish far less technology coverage at a much higher bar. They write about market structure, capital, regulation and competitive position rather than about a product page.
  • English-language and outbound arms. TechNode (founded 2010), KrASIA (36Kr's Singapore-based English arm), Pandaily (founded 2016), PingWest and Sixth Tone publish in English, as do China Daily and the South China Morning Post in Hong Kong. These are the titles you can read without translation and often the only ones willing to quote a foreign spokesperson directly.

A single corporate name can sit in more than one group — 36Kr belongs to the first, and through KrASIA to the fourth — but news thresholds differ by title rather than by owner, so a relationship with one masthead does not transfer to the rest.

How large the startup tier actually is, in its own numbers

36Kr is the clearest reference point because it filed for a US listing and therefore had to disclose how the business works. It was founded in December 2010 and listed American depositary shares on Nasdaq in November 2019 under the ticker KRKR, pricing at USD 14.5 a share after cutting the deal size to roughly USD 20 million; coverage at the time described it as China's closest equivalent to TechCrunch. Its filings reported roughly 98,000 pieces of content in 2017 and about 108,000 in 2018, and average monthly page views in the region of 348 million for the twelve months to mid-2019.

The number that matters for a press release is the footnote attached to that traffic figure: most of it arrived through third-party accounts on Weibo, WeChat, Toutiao and Zhihu rather than through 36Kr's own website. Chinese technology media at this tier are distribution-first. They judge a story by how far it travels, and a release with no number, no named customer and no China angle gives them nothing to travel with.

The revenue mix points the same way. In 2018 online advertising was still the largest single line; by the first half of 2019, corporate value-added services — integrated marketing, events and consulting — had moved ahead of it. The business rewards integrated campaigns, not a one-off translation of a global release dropped into an inbox.

Who actually covers foreign companies

The honest answer is narrower than most media lists imply. Ranked by the likelihood of a foreign company earning a substantive piece:

  1. English-language arms and outbound press — TechNode, KrASIA, Pandaily, Yicai Global, Caixin Global, Sixth Tone, SCMP. Their remit is explaining Chinese business to a global audience, so a foreign company with a China story sits inside it.
  2. Business and financial desks — only when there is a number that changes something, or a structural question worth examining: a licensing change, a data rule, an investment, a plant, a supplier relationship.
  3. Vertical and trade titles — batteries and electric vehicles, semiconductors, industrial automation, gaming, medical devices. Smallest audience, highest intent, and the tier foreign teams most often forget to approach at all.
  4. Startup press — funding, exits, and China entries that are genuinely notable or backed by an investor the desk already tracks.
  5. Aggregators — will take almost anything through a distributor. Treat what appears here as reach, not as validation.

Lists at this level of detail are maintained on our Chinese media list, but the ranking above is the part that changes how a week of outreach gets spent.

What the editor is actually deciding

When a Chinese technology editor opens your release, four questions run in order, and a release that fails the first one rarely gets read far enough to fail the rest.

  • Is it new, and is it theirs to publish? "We have launched in Europe" is not news for a mainland audience. A China-specific consequence is. The broader filter Chinese desks apply is set out in our note on why Chinese media reject press releases.
  • Is it verifiable? Named customers, disclosed amounts, signed agreements, published data. An unattributed claim of a leading position is a reason to put the release down.
  • Is there a Chinese dimension? A partner, a supplier, a user base, an adjacent policy, or a comparison with a Chinese competitor the reader already knows.
  • Is it early or exclusive? Timing still matters, but Chinese outlets do not follow the embargo conventions of their US counterparts. Some desks honour an embargo; others publish the moment the release lands. The practical fix is to release in China and internationally at the same moment instead of embargoing a Chinese title to protect a US launch hour.

Why the English release does not survive translation intact

A carefully written English release runs 600 to 900 words, and most of those words describe the company. Translated literally it arrives as 1,200 to 1,500 Chinese characters of self-description with the market context squeezed into one line — and that self-description is exactly what a Chinese editor cuts first. The ratio a Chinese desk wants is the reverse of the one an English draft usually has: two or three sentences about the company, and the rest about the category, the numbers and the customers. Restructuring is a writing task before it is a translation task; the note on Chinese press release translation and localisation covers why the two are normally separated, and the same constraint is what pushes so many otherwise usable releases past the length an editor will accept.

A working checklist for a first approach

  • Choose the tier before the outlet. A trade title read by forty thousand specialists will do more for you than a flash on an aggregator read by four million people who will not remember it.
  • Lead with the China consequence rather than the global announcement.
  • Put one verifiable number in the first three sentences.
  • Name a Chinese-speaking contact who can answer follow-up questions inside a day.
  • Send a finished Chinese version, not an English text with an offer to translate.
  • Never offer anything in exchange for coverage. Chinese rules on paid news make that sentence dangerous for both sides, and the mechanics are set out in our guide to how to distribute a press release in China.
  • Expect silence from the business and financial tier on a cold approach, and build the relationship long before you need it.

Frequently asked questions

Do Chinese technology outlets accept English releases? The English-language tier does, and it is the tier most likely to write about a foreign company at all. Mainland Chinese-language desks will accept an English text in principle but rarely assign anyone to translate it, so the practical outcome is that it is read and set aside. Send a finished Chinese version.

Is 36Kr the right target for a first approach? Only if you have funding news, a China entry with an investor behind it, or a category data point worth quoting. The 108,000 pieces of content it published in 2018 were overwhelmingly short items; being one more of them is not an outcome worth planning a campaign around.

How many outlets should one release go to? Fewer than most suppliers quote. Ten to fifteen well-chosen titles across the startup, trade and English-language tiers produce more usable coverage than a hundred-site blast, because the higher tiers only write when a human editor decides the story is theirs. The scheduling question — how long it takes once something is published — is covered in how long publishing takes in China.

Should a foreign company build Chinese accounts of its own? Usually yes, and usually before paying for outlet coverage. A WeChat public account and a Baijiahao presence give a Chinese editor somewhere to check that you exist and are active in-market, a check that comes up far more often than foreign teams expect.

How do we know which tier a supplier is really placing us in? Ask for the outlet name, the channel path of the final URL, and whether the page will carry an advertising label. Those three answers separate an editorial placement from commercial inventory faster than any ranking or traffic table.

Start with one tier and one story rather than a media list and a release. Pick the single Chinese consequence that would matter to a reader in Shanghai, put a verifiable number next to it, and write the Chinese version of that before translating anything else. The first headline that gets picked up in this market is almost always the narrowest one you sent.

Frequently asked questions

Do Chinese technology outlets accept English releases?

The English-language tier does, and it is the tier most likely to write about a foreign company at all. Mainland Chinese-language desks will technically accept an English text but rarely assign anyone to translate it, so the practical outcome is that it is read and set aside. Send a finished Chinese version.

Is 36Kr the right target for a first approach?

Only if you have funding news, a China entry with a known investor behind it, or a category data point worth quoting. 36Kr published on the order of 108,000 pieces of content in 2018 according to its own IPO filings, overwhelmingly short items, so being one more of them is not an outcome worth building a campaign around.

How many outlets should one release go to?

Fewer than most suppliers quote. Ten to fifteen well-chosen titles across the startup, trade and English-language tiers generally produce more usable coverage than a hundred-site blast, because the higher tiers only publish when a human editor decides the story is theirs.

Should a foreign company build its own Chinese accounts first?

Usually yes, and usually before paying for outlet coverage. A WeChat public account and a Baijiahao presence give a Chinese editor somewhere to verify that you are active in the market, a check that comes up more often than foreign teams expect.

How can we tell which tier a supplier is actually placing us in?

Ask for the outlet name, the channel path of the final URL, and whether the page will carry an advertising label. Those three answers separate an editorial placement from commercial inventory faster than any ranking or traffic table.

CN NEWSWIRE Editorial Team

Written by the CN NEWSWIRE editorial team in Hangzhou. We place press releases and articles in Chinese media for international clients, and publish what we learn here.

Your story next

Ready to reach Chinese media?

Distribute your announcement today — guaranteed placement on top outlets.